feedback: email or phone (919) 774-1209
VERIZON CRIMINAL COVER UP
Verizon Ethics Line: (800) 856-1885Please call Verizon CEO and DEMAND that he provide TRUTHFUL information to the Verizon Audit Committee
and to immediately cease and desist putting tremendous pressure on Kavitha Ranganathan to commit perjuryAny reasonable person knows that if everything being stated on this website were not absolutely true,
Verizon would have gotten a judge to force this website to be taken down long ago
Our department could NOT have passed a software raid anytime during my employ and everyone knew that with absolute certainty
CEO of Verizon Communications who refuses to provide verification of ownership of
rampant stolen intellectual property possibly into the billions of dollars,
thus defrauding stockholders just like convicted felon Bernie Ebbers.
Ivan G. Seidenberg
(212) 395-1000
140 West Street
New York, NY 10007
You might not get caught;
therefore,
you MUST commit the felony
Secular Progressive Logic
VERIZON CRIMINAL COVER UP
Below is a response to the recent comments I received from you:
Dear Mr. Reed:
Thank you for providing me with information regarding Mr. Thomas Farr.
I am proud and humbled to serve as Florida's thirty-third United States Senator, and I intend to work hard to represent all Floridians here in the United States Senate. Through your correspondence, I am informed of the issues that are important to you and am better able to serve your interests in the Senate.
I appreciate being apprised on issues of importance to the people of Florida. I will be sure to keep this information in mind as we proceed in the 110th Congress.
Again, thank you for contacting me. If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. In addition, for more information about issues and activities important to Florida, please sign up for my weekly newsletter at http://martinez.senate.gov.
Sincerely,
Mel Martinez
United States Senator
Email sent to Rick Cassidy shortly after he was shown the mapping solution that Alvin Reed was never allowed to show the customer because MCI was so intent on retaliating against Alvin Reed for his objections to the commission of felonies. Rick was shown date verification that it was unmodified since thursday morning, January 20, 2005. Rick, during the conversation being shown this mapping noted that he and Tammy Wilfong were told words to the affect of "remember who signs your pay check". When Tammy responded with words to the affect of "what if we are put under oath?", the response was to the affect of "well, do what you have to do".
Rick was too afraid for his job at the time to respond to this email. Alvin Reed has made several thousand contacts with government officials since that time, and Rick has finally become brave enough to start providing truthful information to authorities after these thousands of direct and indirect contacts with government authorities.
Note that all but the first and last question deal with the million map a day solution by Alvin Reed that DID meet the three million dollar a day cost reduction order by the Worldcom bankruptcy court order, but was never allowed to be pursued. Rick Cassidy, Tammy Wilfong, and others within their department have confirmed on multiple occasions that even years later, they have yet to get the project managers clearly inferior mapping solution to work and have had to pull the solution because it is so slow. The next projected date to get the project managers clearly inferior mapping solution to even work at all is May of 2007.
This is SOX retaliation run amuk.
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE???
------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Alvin Reed
To: RJCassidy55@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 8:02 PM
Subject: Morals and Ethics
Please describe how Pamela Hogg held back the parser for several years.
--------
Please compare the mapping solution by Alvin Reed and Pamela Hogg.
Please discuss your recollection of these features and compare to Pamela Hogg
Instantaneous dynamic mapping
Obtains all similar streets in a list which can be used to ATP on the fly
Obtains all similar xstreets in a list which can be used to ATP on the fly
Obtains all similar xstreets2 in a list which can be used to ATP on the fly
Fiber fully banded on screen upon presentation
Street with exact match shown in wide red
Similar to street, including N E S W, with narrow red
XStreet with exact match shown in wide green
Similar to xstreet, including N E S W, with narrow green
XStreet2 with exact match shown in wide orange
Similar to street2, including N E S W, with narrow orange
Label for all streets turned on and off and resized locally
Tip box label available locally for all streets
Similar streets found for each line in comments
City list within the county provided.
Full scaling and transposing available at client
One dynamic new map per second only uses two percent of inexpensive server
Three million dynamic maps created in three days
--------
Did MCI at any point encourage employees to obey the law. Please elaborate.
------------------------------------
I Acknowledge receiving this email and having seen Alvin's Demo of the mapping application.
Rick Cassidy notorized on 03/19/07
Rick was also shown verification that the last change date was the morning of January 20, 2005
"I have been told that federal marshals come into a business with loaded guns when doing a pirated software raid. For an honest employee who does not have proof of ownership readily available, even something as innocent as an inadvertent sneeze at the wrong moment could trigger an automated response from a federal marshal that the employee's widow would have to explain to their children. This is, in part, the reason for my situational anxiety to being forced to commit felonies under duress."
Portion of plea sent from Alvin Reed to US judgeship nominee Thomas Farr's law firm August 22, 2005, and in US Supreme Court brief "Reed v MCI".
Any reasonable person knows that if this software were not stolen, that the company would have provided, as part of discovery, what would have been available to hand over to armed federal marshals during a software raid.
To the Honorable Attorney General Alberto Gonzales,
Fired for Refusing to Commit Felonies or Refusing to Obey Constitution
I was fired from Worldcom for refusing to commit felonies. You can read about my case at http://whitehouse08.info and http://ethics101.org. The DOJ, as it exists today, is allowing this company to get away with this. I do not blame you, but the system in general as it is designed to protect only the rich, the famous, and the powerful. The DOJ should protect citizens from being fired for refusing to commit felonies, even if we are not rich, or famous, or powerful.
If these lawyers were fired for refusing to commit felonies, then you should resign. If they were fired for refusing to follow the United States Constitution, then you should keep your job.
Judgeship nominee Thomas Farr's lawfirm continues to refuse to correct court documents falsely claiming there was never any pirated software anywhere in the company, and placing tremendous pressure on potential witnesses such as Kavitha Ranganathan, Dave Vermilyea, Jeff Showers, and others to commit perjury to substantiate these flagrant lies.
Any United States Senator who votes to put Thomas Farr on a federal bench is making a very clear message to the America people:
If you are told to commit a FELONY in corporate America,
commit the felony and
KEEP YOUR TRAP SHUT,
if you want to keep your job and your career
This is the WRONG message for United States Senators to send to the American people.
Please contact your US Senator and ask them to vote for TRUTH in court documents
4/12/07 Open Letter to Verizon Audit Committee located at http://ethics101.org
The United States Supreme Court, in June of 2006, Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v White, Case No. 05-269, says in part, “...could well dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination” As a strong Christian, it is against my religion to commit felonies. Also, my doctor has diagnosed me with a disability of “Situational Anxiety Disorder” caused as a direct result of being required to feloniously load and use rampant pirated software at Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, as a condition of employment, and the resulting hostile environment when I objected. My situational anxiety becomes worsened each time this company gets away with falsely claiming in court documents that there was never any pirated software at this company.
Thank you in advance for asking Ed McGinty, (678) 259-5484, and his boss Robert Patterson (516) 357-7544, for receipts as long as they continue to refuse to correct court documents falsely claiming that there was never any pirated software at this company. Your committee asking for these receipts will bring “Trust and Credibility” to the Verizon Audit Committee. Dissuading reasonable workers from complaining in the first place is illegal and I fully trust that you will ask Ed McGinty and Robert Patterson for these receipts as long as they continue to refuse to correct the court documents.
Instead of billion dollar profits, this could very well mean billion dollar loses of this fully owned subsidiary of Verizon.
| Verizon Audit Committee responsible for enforcing SOX 301 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Barker |
Robert W. Lane |
Sandra O. Moose |
Donald T. Nicolaisen |
Thomas H. O'Brien |
Clarence Otis, Jr. |
A solution now is very simple, just give me my life back. The longer Verizon continues to dissuade reasonable workers from objecting in the first place to feloniously loading and using rampant pirated software, thus defrauding stockholders by basing profits on stolen property, including fines, possibly into the billions of dollars, the worse the solution will be for Verizon CEO, Verizon CFO, Verizon Audit Committee, and corporate America in general. Sarbanes Oxley law only requires that I reasonably believed we could not provide the receipts if a software raid had occurred and that I reasonably believed that basing profits on stolen property, possibly into the billions of dollars, is defrauding stockholders. As a stockholder, I know it would defraud me to find out that if the company obeyed the law, instead of billion dollar profits, it would be billion dollar losses of a fully owned subsidiary of which the Sarbanes Oxley act makes the CEO, CFO, and Audit committee fully responsible.
Thank you in advance for asking Ed McGinty and Robert Patterson for these receipts. This criminal cover up makes any reasonable person conclude that this is far more wide spread then just my department. A quick and quite solution now will bring “Trust and Credibility” to the Verizon Audit Committee to let the world know you discovered that this fraud was confined only to my department.
Alvin Reed
(919) 774-1209
CC: United States Senate Judiciary Committee
"We need a culture that encourages what is right and discourages what is wrong—and has the
wisdom
to understand the difference."
Senator Brownback
BACKGROUND
For anyone reading this who is not a rocket scientist,
WHY is Verizon not suing me for slander and getting
a judge to force me to remove this web page if everything I am stating here is not absolutely accurate.
With all due respect to the legal profession, this is not rocket science.
Where's the beef (receipts)???
Secion 806 of
the
Sarbanes Oxley
act
only
requires
"REASONABLE BELIEF".
Duhhhhhhhhhh
!!!!!!!!
"A
free
market cannot include the freedom
to cheat, to defraud or to steal."
U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Memo to file (I am copying Senator Clinton on this email to protect my family should Verizon take retalitory steps against me for pointing out admissions of a criminal cover up by Verizon, I am asking Senator Clinton to forward this email to the FBI)
There was a disturbing anonymous call with Verizon security officer, Ed Mcginty (678-259-5484), this morning. This is with regard to Verizon Ethics office re-opening my case that I brought to the MCI ethics office in January of 2005. The anonymous Verizon case number is VER07010128, pin T595.
It was quite clear that Verizon security did in fact re-open the case and allegedly agreed to look at both old and new facts that are completely out of sink with what Mr Farr's law firm is stating in court documents with regard to whether or not there was pirated software at Worldcom/MCI. Ed Mcginty and the anonymous caller did confer that Steve Helvin (877) 624-0007 never actually said that Alvin Reed was fired for "drinking on the job", that it was only inferred. The anonymous caller did tell Ed Mdginty that Steve Helvin did clearly intend to defame the character of Alvin Reed to make it appear that Alvin Reed was fired for some other reason then refusing to commit felonies. The example given by Steve Helvin was "drinking on the job". I absolutely consider this to be wrongful defamation of character, false, and slanderous and a clear attempt by Steve Helvin to cover up the real facts in this case.
Just for the record, one statement that Ed Mcginty made that was absolutely wrong was to say that Alvin Reed could not just decide to not show up for work because the investigation was not complete. Whoever provided this information to Ed Mcginty had clearly left out the fact that I was on doctors care to not commit felonies because of the situtational anxiety that the commission of felonies, and resulting hostile environment, caused me. If the reciepts or any indication of ownership are not found (which they cannot possibly be found since that don't exist), then Ed Mcginty is once again stating that Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, employees must commit felonies as a condition of employement even though they know absolutely that it is felonies and the company, even to this day, cannot find any indication that this property was paid for, thus stolen, thus felonious. Ed Mcginty inferred that the MCI ethics office told Alvin Reed (me) that the property was not stolen. Ed Mcginty was corrected by the anonymous caller, but made no indication that he would use the corrected information in his investigation.
Towards the end of the call, Ed Mcginty was asked if he would take steps to correct the court documents stating there was no pirated software if his investigation found no receipts or any indication of tracking how many copies of software where being used, other then the couple of mock purchases after many complaints. Based on all the new evidence, a new investigation that found that the ownership was not there would indicate that Rick's signed statement and my testimony throughout where indeed correct, that the software was stolen. The company cannot argue poor record keeping because management was advised repeatedly since August of 2003 of the affect on my health any software of questionable ownership caused me.
Ed Mcginty made it very clear that he would NOT see to it that the court documents are corrected, which would clearly be an attempt by Verizon security to cover up the stolen property. By the spirit and letter of SOX law and numerous other state and federal laws, it is illegal to cover up stolen property when court documents claim that the property was not stolen.
It was made clear to Ed Mcginty that this would constitute a criminal cover-up if his new investigation revealed that the company could not find the receipts or any indication of tracking how many, other the the mock purchases, when other evidence clearly shows that the company was repeatedly advised of the stolen property. Ed Mcginty at that point threatened to sue the anonymous caller for accusing him of being part of a criminal cover up. The anonymous caller had done no such thing. The anonymous caller was only pointing out that after the investigation, if the receipts or indication of ownership was not found, and the court documents were not corrected, then, by definition, that would constitute a criminal cover up. Ed Mcginty's words and demeanor indicated that he had seemed to have already decided to be part of what he knew would have to be a criminal cover up.
Because I know the facts in the case, I am stating here that I, Alvin Reed, in sound mind and body am absolutely saying that if this new investigation does in fact show that their was pirated software (which it will if actually done), and the court documents that claim there was not pirated software are not corrected, then this would indeed be a criminal cover-up. To sue me for saying this, the company would have to show verification of ownership. I have never questioned that there was a small amount of mock purchases made and I clearly point out that that is not what I am referring to. I am referring to all the other stolen property.
If Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, plans to sue me for pointing out the fact that a future event where a criminal cover up might occur, would in deed be a criminal cover up if done, then I advise Thomas Farr's law firm that they would have to provide a multitude of forged documents to make the case for Thomas Farr's law firm. Just this morning, MapInfo, once again, verbally confirmed the absense of verification of ownership for all the MapInfo software used illegally between August of 2003 and May of 2004. Thomas Farr's law firm cannot possibly provide verification of ownership of the MapInfo software during that time without it being forged documents.
Alvin Reed
For the record, both Peggy Brug (908) 559-3671 of Verizon Ethics office and Robert Patterson, (516) 357-7544, this morning refused to answer the question of whether or not the company would correct court documents that the new investigation finds to be totally false in material facts. Robert Patterson is Ed McGinty's manager.
I consider this refusal to answer a simple question of whether or not Verizon will obey the law as a clear and concise admission of a willingness to participate in a Verizon criminal cover up and for the record, these admissions make my situational anxiety to pirated software worse. Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, clearly did not, and will not make reasonable accomodations for my disability of situational anxiety to pirated software, and thus are in clear violation of EEOC law.
Alvin Reed
"Verizon does not tolerate falsification or improper alteration of records.
It is never appropriate to direct someone else to prepare or approve
a false or misleading record
and it is no defense to say that someone else directed you to
make a record that you knew or
had reason to suspect was false or misleading."
Verizon Alleged Code of Conduct
--------------------------
"If you want to keep your job and your career,
commit the felony and keep your trap shut."
Verizon Actual Code of Conduct
Rick Cassidy signed statement that is currently in US DOL ARB court and has been accepted as fact for court determination
MCI legal's flowery admission that they couldn't find any receipts or anything tracing ownership back to my department
---------------------------------------------------'I have read the voluminous documents you produced and I have spoken to several people at MCI.
From what I understand, all of your allegations were thoroughly investigated and you were advised
that none of the software you used was "pirated." You were assured on multiple occasions that MCI
had plenty of licenses for the software you were using. For reasons unknown to me, you refuse to
believe this and insist on being provided "proof of ownership" as if it consisted of a sheet of
paper that could be sent to you. This is not how it works.
What you want does not exist.
MCI has licenses and in order to give you "proof" that they have not exceeded their licenses
you would need to be shown each and every computer at MCI so you could count which ones had the
software installed on it to make sure the licenses were not exceeded.
This is not going to happen. It would be unduly burdensome.'
----------------------------------------------------We were NEVER advised that it WASN'T pirated, but quite the opposite, repeatedly told that is WAS in fact pirated, including in some cases by the software companys themselves. The only ones that ever claimed that there were enough licenses where the lawyers years after my complaints started in August of 2003. This is a
VERIZON CRIMINAL COVER UP RUN AMUK
When the Business Software Alliance (BSA) comes in with federal marshals toting guns, no one is allowed such rediculous logic. If you can't provide verification of ownership of the software on your computer, you are subject to up to five years in a federal penitentiary, no ifs, ands, or buts.
Memo to file (to record recent phone call with Rick Cassidy, as it relates to false statements by [Verizon security officer] this morning)
Note: (I am copying a United States Senator on this memo to file for my own protection and the protection of my family.)
This morning, Verizon security officer told an anonymous caller, with regard to my case, that he had spoken with Rick Cassidy and that everything I was saying was completely different then what Rick Cassidy had told him. I just got off the phone with Rick Cassidy and confirmed that such a statement is absolutely false. Rick noted one conversation in particular that Dave Vermilyea had told in one of our meetings with several people present, although, neither Rick or myself remember exactly who, but the persons in the room definitely included Rick, myself, Dave Vermilyea, and Jeff Showers, and probably included Kavitha Rangathan, and Pamela Hogg.
Dave made it very clear to everyone in the room that the Mapinfo we were using was stolen. I personally confirmed this with Mapinfo this morning.
MapInfo records and the salesman that we dealt with at the time could not find any purchase of the mapping software up until May of 2004. At most, there was a verbal agreement of 90 days, but the 90 days was surpassed significantly. There were other episodes of stolen MapInfo as well.Rick Cassidy told [the Verizon security officer] (Verizon security officer) about Dave Vermilyea giving a person in our department several years ago when Rick was sitting on our aisle a copy of Toad and told outright that it was stolen but they must use it anyway because management wasn't going to buy enough licenses. Toad was required for us as a condition of employment for many years. Legal copies of Toad where not aquired until after many months of me complaining of this pirated software. The first and only multiple copy purchase of Toad was not made until late in the employment of Glenn Johnson, long after I had sent many many emails to my manager complaining of the health affects on me of this stolen property.
Rick Cassidy told [the Verizon security officer] that I had on many occassions for many years elluded to the pirated software and complained about having being required to use it because it is up to five years in a federal penitentiary for loading and using pirated software.
Rick Cassidy explained to me the way that [the Verizon security officer] tried to twist around these facts by asking Rick if he could PROVE that the software was stolen. Rick of course, could not prove that the software was stolen, but we all where very clearly told that it was stolen. Dave Vermilyea told me many many dozens of times over the years that it was stolen. Kavitha Rangathan was present during some of those conversations.
It is the responsiblity of [the Verizon security officer] to find the receipts or some indication that it was tracked how many copies where used in my department. It has been well established that I complained to management many times in emails, starting in August of 2003.
It is [the Verizon security officer]'s responsibility to bring truthful information that, other the a couple of mock purchases after many complaints, the receipts or any indication that the number of copies used in our department was being tracked, simply does not exist. The vast majority of the software we where required to load and use as a condition of employment was absolutely stolen property and [the Verizon security officer] will know this if he actually does a real invetigation.
If [the Verizon security officer] covers up this rampant pirated software in our department, it is absolutely a criminal cover up and the CEO of Verizon must take responsibility.
Alvin Reed
"MY JOB WOULD BE IN JEOPARDY"
MCI managers response, twice, when asked to provide truthful information to authorities.This is flagrant obstruction of justice by Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon,
Judgeship Nominee Thomas Farr is aware of this obstruction of justice and refuses to act.
Caution on Thomas Farr Nomination
Perjury Should Never Be Condoned
Alvin ReedSanford, NC
Recently, I received notice that attorney Thomas A. Farr has been nominated to a Federal Judgeship. The law firm noted in the email was Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. This brought great despair to my household because it is imperative that Federal Judges be above reproach. I personally am aware of perjury condoned by this law firm by co-shareholders in the same office and therefore must express great caution in this nomination. While one cannot conclude generalities from one incident, the buck stops with ownership and even one act of known perjury in a law firm leads one to conclude that this may very well be accepted practice. This cannot be allowed for a Federal Judgeship. An minimum, this issue must be brought before this nominee for him to address.
The perjury that I speak of is as follows: “MCI did not and has not engaged in any illegal activity involving the use of unlicensed software.” This perjury was prepared and written by co-shareholders of this Federal Judgeship nominee at Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. This perjury occurred in court documents for a Sarbanes Oxley retaliation case against Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon. Yes, this is the same Worldcom that is the primary motivator of the Sarbanes Oxley act in the first place. I personally have witnessed in court documents and have multiple emails verifying without question that the statement made is absolutely false.
Another attorney with a different law firm for workers compensation, but for the same issue, stated in an email to me ...”what you want does not exist”... This was in response to discovery for proof of ownership of the stolen intellectual property. This again shows indisputable proof that the statement made with the noted law firm above is perjury. It should be pointed out that this law firm condoned me being fired two days after this discovery, proof of ownership, was refused to me. The reason given for my termination was the prognosis of my doctor. The prognosis of my doctor was situational anxiety directly related to being required to load and use this stolen property as a condition of employment. Thomas A. Farr, as a close colleague, may have been consulted on whether or not to fire me. The US Senate has an obligation to the citizens of this country to ask this judgeship nominee if he had any knowledge of the perjury related to my wrongful dismissal.
When I showed this perjured statement to a co-worker, he gave me this signed statement which was provided as proof to the court of the absurdity of the noted perjured statement: “I was present when a lead member of the development team working on software development for the department I work for openly warned a number of people, including management, that our department was in possession and was using unlicensed software.” Once again, this shows clearly that the noted statement from the indicated law firm is perjured testimony with direct relevance to the case and with the intent to wrongly influence the court.
A call to a Microsoft corporation attorney familiar with documents related to Microsoft interactions with stolen Microsoft Visio and Microsoft Project software at Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, quickly verified that Microsoft could only conclude that this statement could only be made if one only counts a level of proof that was not concluded prior to complete court cycle, again very clearly showing intent to mislead the court on a material fact.
I myself experienced many encounters with phone conversations where one software company in particular would tell me outright that the software we were using was not paid for as it should be. In one case, two co-workers stood directly behind me for a good fifteen minutes, one trying to explain to the other how extremely illegal it would be for us to use a software whose limited time license had expired nearly three years earlier. No sooner had this co-worker walked away, the other co-worker shoved the clearly pirated CD in my direction to load the software on my computer. I remind the reader that, if unable to show duress, the letter of the law is up to five years in a federal penitentiary per unique program. I had no desire to risk imprisonment. It was this objection to this illegal loading and using of pirated software, along with many other recorded objections, that ultimately cost me my job and my career.
This clearly shows multiple verifications that stockholder attorneys for Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C condone perjury in court documents. Nominee Thomas Farr owes it to the American people to explain to the Senate during confirmation hearings of why such illegal perjury is condoned in the law firm that he is associated with and maintains ownership. This issue must be addressed before a Judgeship nominee should be allowed to set on a Federal bench.
To:
Verizon Communications Inc.
1095 Avenue of the Americas - Room 3877
New York, New York 10036
James R. Barker
Richard L. Carrion
Robert W. Lane
Sandra O. Moose
Joseph Neubauer
Thomas H. O'Brien
Hugh B. Price
Ivan G. Seidenberg
Walter V. Shipley
John R. Stafford
Robert D. Storey
Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr.
William P. Barr
Marc C. Reed
Dennis F. Strigl
Thomas J. Tauke
Doreen A. Toben
Thomas A. Bartlett
David H. Benson
John W. Diercksen
Marianne Drost
William F. Heitmann
Joleen D. Moden
Catherine T. Webster
Please ask MCI to provide me by June 1, 2005 proof of ownership of the software programs I was required to use while an employee of MCI.
Thank you.
Alvin Reed
Alvin_R_Reed@yahoo.com
(919) 774-1209
North Carolina State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct
Rule 3.3 Candor toward the Tribunal
(a) A lawyer shall not knowingly:
(1) make a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal
or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law
previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;
|
ORIGINAL INTENT or BUSTWe are a grassroots organization attempting to convince 60 US Senators to indicate a willingness to consider legislation that will bring the United States back to the "Original Intent" of our "Founding Fathers". feedback: email or phone (919) 774-1209 |
|
Issue 2 of (many) is to get Ambassador John R. Bolton confirmed
Please click on the picture of each Democrat US Senator
and tell them that you support BOLTON.
Issue 3 of (many) is to build stronger fences on our southern border
Please click on the picture of each Democrat US Senator
and encourage them to support a strong border fence.
Issue 4 of (many) is to ask judgeship nominee Thomas A. Farr
why his law firm condones perjury in court documents.
Issue 5 of (many) Abstinence, Yea, or Ney?
Issue 6 of (many) Each US Senator is asked whether or not
they think the Pope believes that God considers to be a sin
a lifestyle that the NC GOP says "is not normal".
Click here for Republican US Senators to send thank you emails to
or view all US Senators on one page
| AL AK AZ AR |
 |
 |
||||||
| CA CO CT DE |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| FL GA HI ID |
 |
 |
 |
|||||
| IL IN IA KS |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
| KY LA ME MD |
 |
 |
 |
|||||
| MA MI MN MS |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||
| MO MT NE NV |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||
| NH NJ NM NY |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||
| NC ND OH OK |
 |
 |
 |
|||||
| OR PA RI SC |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
| SD TN TX UT |
 |
|||||||
| VT VA WA WV |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| WI WY |
 |
 |
|
Wide Red border indicates that one or more persons within this Senate office has taken steps to indicate a willingness to CONSIDER this legislation or issue.Wide Blue border indicates that one or more persons within this Senate office
has been contacted and has indicated a willingness to take steps to BLOCK this legislation or issue
|
|
While I may disagree with her reasoning, the office of the Honorable Senator Hillary Clinton was the only senate office to have the courtesy to return my web email; and therefore, I am attaching Senator Hillary Clinton's email response below. If one reads the notations for red and blue borders, it would be hypocritical for ethics101 to not give the Honorable Senator Hillary Clinton a red border because her senate office is indicating a willingness, at least in words, to consider the Bolton issue. We, as conservatives, are not going to convince anyone of anything if nobody is listening. Open minds, no matter how apart they may start, come together with open and frank discussion.
Alvin Reed (loyal fan of ethics101.org)
Dear Alvin:
Thank you for sharing your thoughts regarding the President's nomination of John Bolton as United States Ambassador to the United Nations (U.N.).
We need a U.N. Ambassador who can work well with other nations on reform efforts and who is committed to the U.N.'s central mission of bringing countries together to address global and multilateral issues and challenges. I believe a reformed U.N. can serve our nation's interests.
I am concerned by the Administration's refusal to turn over documents requested by the Senate during the confirmation process that are critical to a proper evaluation of the Bolton nomination. I will be following the debate over the nomination of John Bolton closely to see whether these concerns are addressed.
Again, thank you for writing. For updates on this and other issues being discussed by the United States Senate, please check my website at
http://clinton.senate.gov .
Sincerely,
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
Make Mexico our 51st State!! It's a win win situation!...For the sake of ending our dependency on Middle Eastern Oil...MAKE MEXICO OUR 51st STATE. Thank you,
Donna Hall
While I may not agree with his reasoning, I give the Honorable Senator Edward Kennedy the same courtesy as the Honorable Senator Hillary Clinton above. Again, I point out that open communications is everything. We need both sides of the aisle to bring "Original Intent" back into our homes, businesses, schools, air waves, and most importantly for me, our board rooms.
Alvin Reed (loyal fan of ethics101.org)
Dear Mr. Reed:
Thank you for contacting me concerning the ongoing debate over immigration reform. This is a complex issue, with many concerns, and it requires a comprehensive solution. 12 million undocumented workers are currently living in the United States, working, paying taxes, and raising children who are U.S. citizens. These undocumented immigrants contribute to our economy, and it is long past time to provide legal avenues to bring them out from the shadows.
Border enforcement has increased dramatically from 1990 to 2004. The budget for the Border Patrol has increased from $263 million in 1990 to $1.6 billion today - a six-fold increase. During this period, between 480,000 and 660,000 undocumented immigrants entered the U.S. each year. In all, nearly 9 million have arrived since 1990. Our immigration system is broken, and enforcement alone will not fix it.
We need realistic and comprehensive solutions that will protect our borders, enable temporary workers to enter the country legally, and allow workers already here to earn legal status. I’m proud to be a sponsor, with Senator McCain, of the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act, a comprehensive reform of our nation’s immigration system. Under our proposal undocumented immigrants who wish to become citizens must show they are currently working, pay a $2000 fine, work for an additional six years, pass security checks, pay taxes, learn to speak English, learn about American civics, and get in line behind all other legal immigrants before being eligible for a green card.
Border Security is addressed in the bill. It establishes a National Border Security Strategy, based on "smart" border technology, information sharing, and cooperation with our neighbors. A new temporary visa will be created to allow foreign workers to enter the U.S. The visa will be valid for 3 years, and can be renewed one time for a total of 6 years. Enforcement of current laws will be strengthened, improving fraud detection and allowing random audits of employers to ensure compliance with existing labor laws. Unnecessary obstacles preventing families from being together when immigrating to the U.S. are also removed. The bill will enable undocumented immigrants to come out of the shadows, submit to background checks, and register for legal status. During this time, they would have to continue working, play by the rules, and pay substantial fines and back taxes. The bill is not an amnesty, which implies that all is forgiven. It is not. Undocumented workers must pay fines and go to the back of the line before earning a chance for citizenship.
By heritage and history, America is a nation of immigrants. Our bill proposes necessary changes in the law while preserving this tradition. These necessary changes will ensure that immigrant families today, as in the past, continue to live the American dream and contribute to our prosperity, our security, and our values.
Again, thank you for writing to me about this important issue.
Sincerely,
Edward M. Kennedy
While I respect the Honorable Senator Hillary Clinton's positions noted below, I caution that we should be careful allowing illegal aliens to become citizens without first returning to their country of origin.
Alvin Reed (loyal fan of ethics101.org)
Dear Mr. Reed:
Thank you for sharing with me your concerns regarding the complex issue of immigration reform. I have heard from many of my New York constituents on this important topic.
Our immigration system is in a crisis. There are estimated to be more than 11 million undocumented workers in the country. Our current immigration laws fail to protect our borders, or to provide adequately for our national security. At the same time, unscrupulous employers seeking cheap labor are permitted to ignore our laws and to exploit undocumented workers. As a result of our immigration laws, families are torn apart, unable to reunite with spouses, parents, children and siblings due to a shortage of visas. Our system also places a huge drain on our state social services. We have an immigration system that is broken, and we have to find realistic and fair solutions to fix it.
I support comprehensive immigration reform that is based on a number of principles. We must strengthen our borders to make us safer from the threat of terrorism, and give our Border Patrol agents the resources they need to be more effective in stopping undocumented aliens at the border. We must also engage with Mexico and other countries to solve the problem of illegal immigration. New workplace and interior enforcement laws should be both strict and fair, and must include strict penalties for those who exploit undocumented workers. We must implement a fairer process for people seeking to come to America , particularly for those whose families are torn apart by our failed system. Finally, meaningful reform should include a path to earned citizenship for those who are here, working hard, paying taxes, respecting the law, and are prepared to meet a high bar for becoming a citizen.
Earlier this year I voted in favor of final passage of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . This legislation is designed to strengthen our borders and to provide for an orderly and practical system of immigration that is both strict and fair. The bill is not perfect. However, it begins to address the fundamental challenges that confront our current immigration system, and implements much needed reforms that both honor our heritage as a nation of immigrants and respect our commitment to the rule of law.
Next, Senate and House conferees will meet in an attempt to reconcile the two drastically different immigration reform measures passed in each body. I call on members of the conference to follow the bipartisan, comprehensive approach chosen by the Senate rather than the narrow and punitive bill passed by the House. I also call on the President to exercise his leadership in support of comprehensive immigration reform. I oppose one-sided solutions that simply sound tough but neither address our porous borders nor treat with dignity the millions of families who live and work in our country.
Please know that the thoughts and concerns of my constituents are very important to me and I send my thanks that you took the time to write. For updates on this and the many important issues being considered by the United States Senate, please check my website at
http://clinton.senate.gov .
Sincerely,
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
Conservative Logic
OBEY THE LAW
--------------------
Secular Progressive Logic
YOU MIGHT NOT GET CAUGHT,
THEREFORE,
YOU MUST COMMIT THE FELONY
To Mr. Farr,
As a candidate for a federal judgeship, you have a special responsibility to the citizens of this country. The url http://ethics101.org/#rotinprison contains the statement noted below: If your law firm in any way disagrees with this factual assessment, then please reply to this email. Failure to reply by COB Friday, 3/16/07 will be taken as an admission that your law firm is aware that Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon cannot provide receipts or anything else tying ownership to my department, excluding mock purchases, and is therefore a willing and active participant in what any reasonable person recognizes as a Verizon criminal cover up.
The very fact that you cannot get a judge to get me to take down my website proves that Verizon knows the property was stolen.
It has become quite clear that justice is for sale in this country. The court of public opinion is my only avenue and I intend to use this avenue to its fullest extend and do everything within my power to make "morals and ethics" a prime issue in the billion dollar 08 presidential race.
I have copied government officials on this email for the protection of my family. I once again apologize to these government officials for sending these emails, but it is the only way I know to protect my family from retaliation. I feel led to fight corporate corruption and am convinced that God will use these government officials to shield my family from retaliation.
Alvin Reed
(919) 774-1209
http://ethics101.org
481 Lydia Perry Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Thank you for your recent email regarding Midas advertising on the FX program “The Shield.” We at Midas share your concern about quality TV programming for our advertising and for that reason “The Shield” is not, and never has been, an approved program for Midas advertising.
Upon receipt of your email, we immediately investigated how Midas advertising could have appeared on this program. We have strict guidelines on the programming we purchase for our brand and none of the shows listed in your email are approved for purchase.
We have been informed by FX that this was a trafficking error on their part. Our FX purchases were scheduled to consist only of movies and comedies in line with the character of our brand and our customers
We have directed FX to pull ALL of our advertising pending a review of their trafficking policies that allowed this error to occur.
We are also very upset by this error and quite embarrassed to have our name associated with this particular program.
Again, thank you for your email. We apologize and hope you will consider Midas for your future car care needs.
Thank you.
Situational Anxiety to Pirated Software
I was required to commit felonies as a condition of employment.Three different Verizon security and ethics officers refuse to say that they would correct court documents
even if their new investigation shows these court documents to be false in material facts,
clearly an admission of a willingness to participate in a criminal cover up.
If I had been rotting in prison for all these years,
would Verizon be able to provide reciepts to get me out of prison???
NO, absolutely NOT, BIG FAT NO
Alvin ReedJanuary 30, 2007
Mr. Alvin Reed
481 Lydia Perry Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Thank you . . .
. . for contacting me about this nominee. I appreciate that you have taken the time to communicate your views and concerns with me.
I understand your concern about the nomination of Judge Thomas Farr. Should related legislation come before the U.S. Senate for a vote, I will keep your views in mind, and share your thoughts on this issue with my colleagues who serve on the Judiciary Committee.
Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free to contact me whenever I can be of assistance to you or your family.
Sincerely,
Debbie Stabenow
United States Senator
President Bush signs SOX bill
submitted to http://www.ethics101.org on March 20, 2007
Mr. Farr,
It took thousands of contacts with government officials to get Rick Cassidy comfortable to notarize his signed statement proving that your law firm is knowingly and actively disobeying NC Bar Rule 3.3. Yesterday, he notarized this statement because he finally believed that he could tell the truth without fear of losing his job because of the large number of contacts I have made with government officials. Your law firm can no longer ignore these facts.
You are well aware that your law firm's client, Verizon, is knowingly and actively involved in a criminal cover up in the Reed v MCI case. You have been advised of this repeatedly and your law firm continues to refuse to abide by NC Bar Rule 3.3.
There is no question that money buys justice in this country. I have very little financial resources because I was fired from Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, for refusing to commit felonies which has destroyed my career. Your law firm refuses to correct court documents that Rick Cassidy and I's testimony clearly proves to be false. Dave Vermilyea, Jeff Showers, Kavitha Rangathan, and others, are too afraid for their jobs to provide testimony proving that your law firm is refusing to abide by NC Bar Rule 3.3.
You are a nominee to a federal judgeship. You have a constitutional responsibility. My family is suffering because I lowered my guard and started objecting to being required to commit felonies at MCI, and was retaliatied against because of my objections to being required to commit these felonious.
You know this, yet fail to abide by NC Bar Rule 3.3. If what I am saying here were not true, you would show a judge the receipts that tie ownership of items in question to my department, but since such receipts, or any other proof, do not exist, you cannot get a judge to make me take down my website at http://ethics101.org. All I have is my first ammendment right to tell the truth.
Mr Farr, as a nominee to a federal bench, you have a constitutional obligation to correct the court documents in Reed v MCI.
By copy of this email, I am asking Senator Clinton to NOT vote to confirm Thomas Farr unless or until Mr. Farr's law firm abides by NC Bar Rule 3.3 and corrects the court documents in Reed v MCI.
Alvin Reed